Indicators on h4831sc load data You Should Know

Indicators on h4831sc load data You Should Know

Blog Article

Your session is about to timeout due to inactivity. Click on OK to extend your time and efforts for an additional 0 minutes.

I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was establishing extra strain and was slower than the aged things. I do not remember if I even tried regular h4831 or not; I'm considering not. Click to broaden...

The fact that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is specifically why you might be looking at bigger velocities attained with that powder, versus what you've witnessed With all the IMR stuff. Also good powder, but considerably much better suited to a little smaller cases that has a bit less capacity.

Minnesota H4831SC is my visit within the 7mm Rem Mag, but I'm preserving the minimal I've still left for slide 2021. I would get started lower and work your way up, based on what load data you examine for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.

My working experience is that the SC and SSC loaded to the same excess weight since the prolonged cut demonstrates a reduced velocity.

I am aware, rough occasions. H4831SC will certainly get the job done, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded prolonged. I don't try to remember powder cost off the top of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which happens to be wherever I ordinarily aim being. With your case making use of what you've (and what I ought to have completed) I'd personally start with the tip with the bearing area of the bullet suitable in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as h4831 vs h4831sc soon as you look for a velocity node.

NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Possess a limited source of Varget, plus a good deal much more available H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads almost completely, due to the fact which is just h4831 vs h4831sc what the rifles shoot the top.

Anyhow, I needed to give some 7828SC a try to lessen many of the compression. What a blunder, I could not get this powder to shoot precisely or generate the velocities I get with common 7828.

You might possibly: 1) Go on and possess the firearm(s) detailed down below routinely removed from your searching cart:

Furthermore, it goes on to claim that because of the fshorter grains, that load density might be a little increased.

I've experienced related practical experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders would not shoot properly with anything at all except Fed215's. Some factors just Really don't Engage in nicely with other. Seems like you have chosen three excellent powders, I'd personally anticipate at least one of these to shoot.

The "SC" stands for Brief Minimize. I haven't seen a distinction between both powder dut I do not Believe I'd personally mix them.

Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but experienced significantly better speed and precision with H1000. I would fairly use a slower burning powder with 215g products.

IMR4831 and H4831SC are distinctive. The place you h4831sc may be bewildering it and thinking that it is actually near is H4831 and H4831SC are very related. These two are essentially the identical apart from H4831SC is created to lesser grains so it meters less difficult.